CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

真德國 (Rollei 50mm f1.4 HFT, 以改contax mount) vs 假德國 (Contax CY 50mm f1.4 T* Serial no. 58XXXX) vs 真日本 (ZS 50mm f1.4 T* + M42 to CY adopter)

Testing Platform: Contax RTS2 + Seikonic L308 Meter + Gitzo 1127 Tripod, film kodak 200HD:


個3 枝鏡o既coating完全唔同色:



以size論, ZS真係好大枝, 金工我覺得係3板中最好o既

____________________________________________

顏色之比較:
#1 - Rollei 50mm f1.4 HFT @ f4


#2 - Contax 50mm f1.4 T* @ f4


#3 - ZS 50mm f1.4 T* @ f4

____________________________________________

全開光圈之比較
#1 - Rollei 50mm f1.4 HFT @ f1.4


#2 - Contax 50mm f1.4 T* @ f1.4


#3 - ZS 50mm f1.4 T* @ f1.4

____________________________________________

borken之比較
#1 - Rollei 50mm f1.4 HFT @ f1.4


#2 - Contax 50mm f1.4 T* @ f1.4


#3 - ZS 50mm f1.4 T* @ f1.4

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

brother vincent. thanks.
what are your conclusions?

_________________
Contax : RTS, RTSII(50Y), RTSIII, Aria D, Aria(70Y), N1, ND, T3D(70Y), G2D
Nikon : FM3A, FM3AB
Leica : M9, X1
Fuji : X100
OM : EP2

我自己比較鐘意ZS, 個口味比較爽同個contrast會高dd...

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

all 3 lenses produce very similar bokeh effect.......

_________________
會計
* * * * * *
鯨魚愛Zeiss

thx. in terms of everything, is really very very similar. i cannot distinguish which is which just by looking at the lens.

_________________
Contax : RTS, RTSII(50Y), RTSIII, Aria D, Aria(70Y), N1, ND, T3D(70Y), G2D
Nikon : FM3A, FM3AB
Leica : M9, X1
Fuji : X100
OM : EP2

That I agree! The different is really small. Thus, why MIG?

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

想問下 ZS 配什麼 body 有 auto 光圈 ?

Voigtlander Bessaflex!!!!

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

小弟一直係呢到睇好多鏡頭對比
但很失望每次都係用負片測試 / 拍攝
個人覺得任何鏡頭用搭負片是一種浪費
負片應該係比傻瓜機或一 d 無乜要求的人用的
如果說 "測試" 或 "要用蔡司鏡", 應該要有要求的
負片根本不能真正發揮鏡頭的解像力及色彩
說實話, vincent 兄用 DC 影鏡頭果幾張相
比用蔡司搭負片影出來的還要好

小弟只是說出心聲, 如有得罪, 還請見諒

That ok.....

Negative film is more convience. Actually, I didn't intended to carry out the test but it just suddenly pop-up my mind for this idea and do it at once....

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

就咁係個LCD睇相
其實我覺得ZS個枝,個感覺係特別實淨少少

_________________
Ｎ機唔係臘鴨　Ｎ鏡唔係垃圾
家陣係人玩機　唔係機玩番人

Rollei 果支都吴太差

I agree with Qoo that serious testing should be by positive. however i am also more interested on the testing results by negative as conducted by vincent. Admittedly, most of us take negatives many times more than positives and so i would rather know the result of negatives. yes, negatives fail to show the real difference, but this is exactly the answer that i want.

_________________
Contax : RTS, RTSII(50Y), RTSIII, Aria D, Aria(70Y), N1, ND, T3D(70Y), G2D
Nikon : FM3A, FM3AB
Leica : M9, X1
Fuji : X100
OM : EP2

Yes, be a serious zeiss fans(no matter Rollei,Contax or others),take the testing in serious manner is fair enough for those lenses .