CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週日 28 4月 24 02:14:40

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 17:36:25 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 25 2月 07 02:55:26
文章: 490
我用康泰時AX或者645用自動對焦時發現相機內的合焦LED表示已經對好但從裂像顯示屏上的影像仍差一點點(這情況一直都有,但日本KYOCERA檢查後說我的相機一切正常對焦亦無問題)想請教各位師兄有以上經驗嗎?各位會以相機為準還是用自動對焦後再把裂像對焦用手微調至裂像對焦屏內的影像合焦為止?
各位師兄可否指點一下小弟?
*以上所述都是拍攝物體為建築物;有腳架;AX(28mm F2.8;50mm F1.4; 85mm F1.4; 28-70mm; 35-135mm; 200mm(Ger), 645(80mm F2; 35mm)


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 17:58:47 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 25 2月 07 02:55:26
文章: 490
應該係有關自動對焦的疑問


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 19:50:46 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 22 12月 06 14:38:32
文章: 33
[quote="Ba Bi"]我用康泰時AX或者645用自動對焦時發現相機內的合焦LED表示已經對好但從裂像顯示屏上的影像仍差一點點(這情況一直都有,但日本KYOCERA檢查後說我的相機一切正常對焦亦無問題)想請教各位師兄有以上經驗嗎?各位會以相機為準還是用自動對焦後再把裂像對焦用手微調至裂像對焦屏內的影像合焦為止?
各位師兄可否指點一下小弟?
*以上所述都是拍攝物體為建築物;有腳架;AX(28mm F2.8;50mm F1.4; 85mm F1.4; 28-70mm; 35-135mm; 200mm(Ger), 645(80mm F2; 35mm)[/quote]

During the days when Contax still manufacturing and marketing, my friend has bought a 645 and noting this issues on the day he bought a split-image screen, then, he has replaced four and get one with all things get matched. Photos-wise speaking, the former ones are really not perfectly focus when enlargment is needed. It depends on whether focus could cover it's depth of field or not. That said, you should rely on manual focus rather than its AF.
My AX have this problem before and thus sent to Japan request for the USM focus mechanism replacement. Now, it is perfectly run. Of course, the full cost should be bourned by me. (My reason is of course due to "picky)


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 20:48:19 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 25 2月 07 02:55:26
文章: 490
CP 寫:
Ba Bi 寫:
我用康泰時AX或者645用自動對焦時發現相機內的合焦LED表示已經對好但從裂像顯示屏上的影像仍差一點點(這情況一直都有,但日本KYOCERA檢查後說我的相機一切正常對焦亦無問題)想請教各位師兄有以上經驗嗎?各位會以相機為準還是用自動對焦後再把裂像對焦用手微調至裂像對焦屏內的影像合焦為止?
各位師兄可否指點一下小弟?
*以上所述都是拍攝物體為建築物;有腳架;AX(28mm F2.8;50mm F1.4; 85mm F1.4; 28-70mm; 35-135mm; 200mm(Ger), 645(80mm F2; 35mm)


During the days when Contax still manufacturing and marketing, my friend has bought a 645 and noting this issues on the day he bought a split-image screen, then, he has replaced four and get one with all things get matched. Photos-wise speaking, the former ones are really not perfectly focus when enlargment is needed. It depends on whether focus could cover it's depth of field or not. That said, you should rely on manual focus rather than its AF.
My AX have this problem before and thus sent to Japan request for the USM focus mechanism replacement. Now, it is perfectly run. Of course, the full cost should be bourned by me. (My reason is of course due to "picky)


Thank you, regarding your value information it seems if the picture from view finder not 100% match focus it is better I use manual to trim focus is much better am I right ?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 20:58:23 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週二 14 12月 04 14:51:27
文章: 1467
我部N1換o左裂像對焦屏後,都有呢個問題,不過d相晒出o黎無問題,所以冇理佢.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 21 8月 07 22:47:50 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 25 2月 07 02:55:26
文章: 490
kin 寫:
我部N1換o左裂像對焦屏後,都有呢個問題,不過d相晒出o黎無問題,所以冇理佢.


Kin C-hing, my eyes not very good la, I have ”老花EYES” thus I don't want all of my photos have "foggy feel"
Perhaps I try to take some photos (use AF and manual, same distance; same subject; same f) then enlarge them to check with one is much better.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週三 22 8月 07 09:27:32 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 22 12月 06 14:38:32
文章: 33
[quote="Ba Bi"]
Thank you, regarding your value information it seems if the picture from view finder not 100% match focus it is better I use manual to trim focus is much better am I right ?[/quote]

Yes, however, you should make sure that your eyepiece diopter is accurately adjusted as well and your eye is straight to viewfinder. Otherwise, your adjustment may not be accurate.

Normally, its autofocus is stop within the tolerance level and close to the accurate, the depth of field will cover it. (Don't be unhappy)

However, if you like me using very large aperture very often or picky or you prefer do some enlargment. That is another story.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週三 22 8月 07 21:41:10 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 25 2月 07 02:55:26
文章: 490
CP 寫:
Ba Bi 寫:
Thank you, regarding your value information it seems if the picture from view finder not 100% match focus it is better I use manual to trim focus is much better am I right ?


Yes, however, you should make sure that your eyepiece diopter is accurately adjusted as well and your eye is straight to viewfinder. Otherwise, your adjustment may not be accurate.

Normally, its autofocus is stop within the tolerance level and close to the accurate, the depth of field will cover it. (Don't be unhappy)

However, if you like me using very large aperture very often or picky or you prefer do some enlargment. That is another story.


Oh, I see~ it is say basically the AF is accurate but if users want to do enlarge the photos to print out it is better to trim the focus by manual. Now I knew ”老花EYES” is total inconvenience for me :oops:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週日 26 8月 07 03:38:19 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 24 12月 03 17:09:08
文章: 112
來自: Canada
Some photographers insist on ground-glass focusing, dismissing split-image as inaccurate.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 9 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 69 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作