CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

有咩好提議 ??

18/21/25/28/35 ??

計 C/P 邊支最抵 ??

_________________

Nikon Fans / Contax 擁疐

C/P 值可以有很多種計法

同意章魚兄的說法, C/P 值可以有很多種計法

以最少$計, c/y mount distagon28F2.8最底!

不過distagon 21咁正...用咁o既價錢買差唔多最正o既wide鏡......

我看應先買35,再18,21,25,28.

_________________
渴望捉住人生美好的每一刻.
www.fuxinghk.com
使用CONTAX器材中的G,C/Y,N,C645等系統.

如果冇乜影wide經驗, 建議買35/1.4先, 影近

_________________
Ah Wing (榮) - 毒菜會會計

結論一個字： 齊！

For second hand Carl Zeiss wide angle lens .... Beware of those lens have FLOATING ELEMENTS ! ! ! Specially the 35/1.4 Distagon ! ! ! must be tested before buy ! ! ! It is very difficult to re-alignment without appropriate equipment. I have no experience with the 21/2.8 so cannot give any ideas. The 18/4 is more reliable in terms of Floating elements alignment problem since the rear group is fixed, only the front group serves as focusing + Flaoting. Therefore more easily for re-alignments if needed. All other mentioned wide angle lens has no floating elements. (except the 15/3.5 and 28/2 Distagon).

Sorry, I should post that above reply in the topic: 買二手鏡
if buy new lens, please ignore my above reply. Sorry
http://forum.contax-club.org/viewtopic.php?t=236

Thank's comment ~~ I think I'll focus on second hand lens.

because no more money to buy a new one ~~ ^__^

_________________

Nikon Fans / Contax 擁疐

The no. of elements of a lens should also be considered..........

I suppose for those lenses having fewer lens elements, the alignment of the elements are especially cricial for the correctness of the optical path, which will affect the overall optical performance of the lens. (e.g Planar 135/2 with 5 elements only...........)

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

如只買一枝, d35/1.4

_________________
C/Y system

同意... 買了這一枝... 便有決心買其他

我的下一個目標, 28 2.8 C/Y Mount 這枚.

便宜低買

咁最有味道既 wide 鏡, 又係邊支?