CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

特別鳴謝 Vincent 借出85/1.2

Film: Fuji Xtra 400
Scanning: FDI Photo CD

注: 翻閱照片沖印數據, P100/2 的調色比其他略淺......

Rollei 85/1.4 HFT @ f/1.4 VS Contax 85/1.2 50 yr T* AEG @ f/1.2

.

Rollei 85/1.4 HFT @ f/2 VS Contax 100/2 T* MMJ @ f/2 VS Contax 85/1.2 50 yr T* AEG @ f/2

..

Rollei 85/1.4 HFT @ f/4 VS Contax 100/2 T* MMJ @ f/4 VS Contax 85/1.2 50 yr T* AEG @ f/4

..

Rollei 85/1.4 HFT @ f/8 VS Contax 100/2 T* MMJ @ f/8 VS Contax 85/1.2 50 yr T* AEG @ f/8

..

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

是否可以將圖左右放,這樣一來容易對比.

_________________
渴望捉住人生美好的每一刻.
www.fuxinghk.com
使用CONTAX器材中的G,C/Y,N,C645等系統.

單睇resolution, 枝851.2係最好, 而100f2 d散焦最好, d色係枝85f1.2最濃. 枝85f1.4就好似乜都係中間....

Vincent 講得幾啱，最好有得睇原底/相，等我試吓D毒素

從上面圖片看85/1.2的色彩飽和度最好.
是否可以試試Rollei 85/1.4與contax85/1.4的德製及日製的效果?
因為大家都是同一製式比較容易分辨.

_________________
渴望捉住人生美好的每一刻.
www.fuxinghk.com
使用CONTAX器材中的G,C/Y,N,C645等系統.

昨天我乜取了我的照片, 得出o既結果差唔多, 不過我的100f2AEG色彩飽和度比wah少post出黎o既相高一點點.

雖然今次冇Rollei 85/1.4與contax85/1.4比較, 但記憶中AEGo既contax85f1.4o既色彩係非鮮艷, 所以比我話我會覺得:

鮮艷度 -> 50yr85f1.2 > 60yr85f1.2 > MMG85f1.4 > AEG85F1.4 > MMJ 85f1.4 > Rollei 85f1.4 > AEG100f2 > MMJ100f2

不過以上只係從記憶估計... , 其實從單一睇每一枝o既色彩都有返咁上下....

做多些測試，好讓我大飽眼福

章魚講得好，Zeiss 咁多鏡，有排試。

http://www.sl66.com/HFT_coating.htm

"Keep in mind that the original Zeiss lenses with dual coating already were extremely good protected against flare, and according to some connoisseurs, the HFT coated lenses are believed to draw a little bit softer image.'

我係上面條link睇到o既....

Thanks, Vincent.

唔知宜家那裏還能買到p85/1.4的mmg?? 價位又係點呢??

_________________
攝影．助我留下回憶
回憶．使我珍惜現在
現在．讓我面對將來


Billy Ting
http://billyting.fotop.net/

From f/4 and f/8 image, the Rollei HFT have its special tri-angular out of focus image rendering. Don't know the HFT Planar is a early version of late version ? It is says that the optical design is slightly different.