CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

有無聽過 HFT 好過T* 呢.

_________________
yt

我自己就好喜歡HFT 的表現,在我經驗中,HFT 係比 T* 好小小,現在HASS 加晒價,6008AF 就一D 都唔貴.

_________________
yt

用202FA 有個好處,
可以用好多古董鏡,不過咁玩仲死得快............
我有支古董拉架,改左比2000用呀........................問你死味

_________________
yt

jason, paul posted an article discussing DOF in film photography some time ago.

it may complement what FR said.

http://www.vanwalree.com/optics/dof.html

200真係好野來呀,280點又呀,我無玩過呀.

_________________
yt

咁真係唔知邊個會毒死邊個啦

_________________
yt

I have 6008i before and current have Rollei SL66 & 3.5F. I also have 500CM, SWC & 2000FCW. I think:

1. I do believe Rollei PQ/PQS HFT lens have better performance then hasselblad CF/CFi T* except 110/2.

2. I do not trust any Rollei 600X electronics. Extremely easy to have defective.

3. Most of Rollei body are seem not very reliable except those TLR!

4. I think if you handle with care, hasselblad 2XX/2XXX series should be much reliable then Rollei...

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

Well Personally I don't think so, I do agree the HFT exhibit more saturated and rich hue than T*, but T* exhibit far better end range tonal recording ( it does not block up color on highlight and shadow area ). To me its analogy like Astia vs Velvia. Most like Velvia for the rich color and saturation. I am not !!

_________________

I think it should be subject to lens by lens cases. At least this is not the case if you compare PQS80 & 150 with CF80 & 150

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

死火,睇完呢條thread
知多左d野....但好像.....比各大大愈毒愈勁...... @@!

講講下真係想去試中幅

btw,張士多啤利,實得好驚人....

_________________
Ｎ機唔係臘鴨　Ｎ鏡唔係垃圾
家陣係人玩機　唔係機玩番人

我無正式去做過 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 同 Hass T* lens 比較,只係有幾次玩玩 Rollei 的經驗，有一次經驗可以同大家分享，我用 Hass ﹠ Rollei 拍一個50幾歲的女士，Hass 出來的影像就十分真確（係咁樣），相反她丈夫拿上一張相片說，呢張用電腦修飾過嗎？看來年輕好多呀（當然無啦）。
事後，我一再仔細分析，發覺 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 在超高分析之下反差再比 Hass T* lens 柔和一點，色彩又十分美艷， Hass T* lens 就比較硬了一點點，所以 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 拍出來的相片,看來好像年輕了。
在這次拍照經驗，我體驗到，鏡頭銳利同反差的關系。

_________________
yt

我無正式去做過 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 同 Hass T* lens 比較,只係有幾次玩玩 Rollei 的經驗，有一次經驗可以同大家分享，我用 Hass ﹠ Rollei 拍一個50幾歲的女士，Hass 出來的影像就十分真確（係咁樣），相反她丈夫拿上一張相片說，呢張用電腦修飾過嗎？看來年輕好多呀（當然無啦）。
事後，我一再仔細分析，發覺 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 在超高分析之下反差再比 Hass T* lens 柔和一點，色彩又十分美艷， Hass T* lens 就比較硬了一點點，所以 Rollei ＨＦＴ lens 拍出來的相片,看來好像年輕了。
在這次拍照經驗，我體驗到，鏡頭銳利同反差的關系。[/quote]
無錯, 的確如此.

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

let see any club gethering, I can show you my 10x10 photo that taken by Rollei PQS80 & 150, also many Hasselblad lens. You may know more then! I am sure, at least in compare with 80mm & 150mm lens, Rollei HFT is better....

(I think HFT Distagon 35mm.1.4 is better then CY version too....)

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

As YT puts it, the T* lens are more faithful to reality, that's better to me !!

_________________

HI ALL
(I think HFT Distagon 35mm.1.4 is better then CY version too....)
我都估計係呀.

_________________
yt