CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週五 29 3月 24 15:14:13

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 12 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
文章發表於 : 週二 07 12月 04 00:50:47 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 15 10月 04 03:02:41
文章: 33
來自: Hong Kong
I am planning to buy one of the above lens.

Can any brothers share their experience on using these two lens.
Which one has a better picture quality and whcih one can focus faster!

Thanks

_________________
Shooters


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
文章發表於 : 週二 07 12月 04 12:10:03 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週五 12 11月 04 15:42:01
文章: 58
Shooters 寫:
I am planning to buy one of the above lens.

Can any brothers share their experience on using these two lens.
Which one has a better picture quality and whcih one can focus faster!

Thanks


Actually, I have the same question and cannot decide either. :roll: It seems logical to go for the Tele-Apotessar T* 350/4 645 if you have both systems, but the lens is quite large and not sure how good is the AF speed. Is there any review on either lens? or some brothers can share their experience please? :D :D


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 07 12月 04 14:20:09 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
According to my friend who use them ( he's not local ) Both are very good lens and perform above any others, but forget about the speed. None of them are really FAST. They are not slow but they are n ot fast. Certainly not up to the like of Canoan or Nikon's new and current Long Tele.

In fact none of the N series lens can be considered fast in term of AF. The matter is how fast is fast enough. If you intend to shoot a lot of wild life up close or dynamic subject like fast pace sport. then for sure the N series is not quite the system to go for ...

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 07 12月 04 17:07:17 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週五 12 11月 04 15:42:01
文章: 58
FR 寫:
According to my friend who use them ( he's not local ) Both are very good lens and perform above any others, but forget about the speed. None of them are really FAST. They are not slow but they are n ot fast. Certainly not up to the like of Canoan or Nikon's new and current Long Tele.

In fact none of the N series lens can be considered fast in term of AF. The matter is how fast is fast enough. If you intend to shoot a lot of wild life up close or dynamic subject like fast pace sport. then for sure the N series is not quite the system to go for ...


Appreciate your advise. I think the 350 f4 is selling for approx $28k which is good value considering (a) its size and (b) it's a zeiss! :D :D :D


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 07 12月 04 21:26:09 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週三 26 5月 04 18:33:58
文章: 3295
來自: Vesalius
sanfan 寫:
FR 寫:
According to my friend who use them ( he's not local ) Both are very good lens and perform above any others, but forget about the speed. None of them are really FAST. They are not slow but they are n ot fast. Certainly not up to the like of Canoan or Nikon's new and current Long Tele.

In fact none of the N series lens can be considered fast in term of AF. The matter is how fast is fast enough. If you intend to shoot a lot of wild life up close or dynamic subject like fast pace sport. then for sure the N series is not quite the system to go for ...


Appreciate your advise. I think the 350 f4 is selling for approx $28k which is good value considering (a) its size and (b) it's a zeiss! :D :D :D


如果有用埋C645就買350好
如果只係用N機,400/4都可以考慮下,因為行貨只需二萬三

_________________
N機唔係臘鴨 N鏡唔係垃圾
家陣係人玩機 唔係機玩番人


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 08 12月 04 02:11:44 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 15 10月 04 03:02:41
文章: 33
來自: Hong Kong
Thanks FR for your information.

You are right, the focus speed will never be as fast as the Nikon or Canon. :?

I was quoted HK$ 26,000 for the 350/F4 645 and HK$ 24,000 for the 400/F4.

I am actually debating whether I will use the 645 with the 350/F4 for wildlife or motorsport photos, it would be such a bulk to carry around. :shock:
I am more incline to go for the 400/F4 for the extra 50mm and a little bit less expensive.

I also think that the design of the 400 is newer than the 350 hence optically could be better. Can any brothers confirm that! :?:

Perhaps it will be my X'mas present from Santa :lol:

_________________
Shooters


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 08 12月 04 11:27:56 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週六 08 11月 03 01:36:09
文章: 8818
我就會買 350/4


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 08 12月 04 16:33:00 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週一 10 11月 03 01:35:25
文章: 2313
來自: Hong Kong
點解350/4咁平? :cry: :cry: :? :shock:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 08 12月 04 22:39:38 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 15 10月 04 03:02:41
文章: 33
來自: Hong Kong
新手畢特 brother,

Please advise which shop is selling the 400/f4 at HK$ 23,000.

Thanks a lot

_________________
Shooters


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 09 12月 04 15:10:54 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週五 12 11月 04 15:42:01
文章: 58
Shooters 寫:
新手畢特 brother,

Please advise which shop is selling the 400/f4 at HK$ 23,000.

Thanks a lot


Also which shop quoting $26,000 for C645 350/f4? Thank You!
:D


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週五 10 12月 04 00:34:28 
討論區新手

註冊時間: 週五 15 10月 04 03:02:41
文章: 33
來自: Hong Kong
Wing Shing quoted me HK$ 24,000 for the 400/F4 and HK$ 26,000 for the 350/F4.

Obviously, you have to be very pushy to get the price.

_________________
Shooters


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週五 10 12月 04 10:45:59 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週五 12 11月 04 15:42:01
文章: 58
Shooters 寫:
Wing Shing quoted me HK$ 24,000 for the 400/F4 and HK$ 26,000 for the 350/F4.

Obviously, you have to be very pushy to get the price.


Thanks ... :wink:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 12 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 18 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作