CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

GR 28mm F1.9



http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/news ... 05204.html

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

DC 嚟講光圈大都唔及高ISO 嚟得方便同實際!
以GR 嘅特色, 嗰塊CCD 同嗰個處理器就算支鏡係"鏡皇"都死啦!

不如主力攪好塊CCD 或者個處理器仲好過啦!

_________________
I LOVE ALFA ROMEO

High ISO ... what a laugh, its pretty much so whatever brand, if one stay with small format sensor, then its simply prudent to stay at low ISO. Isn;t that why people so excited abotu the Sigma DP and the Olympus E-P1 , their sensor. For real. Ricoh been doing fine, and there's simply no such thing as having the performance but yet not having the size and bulk.

Shoot RAW, stay low ( at ISO ) or simply be prepared to do the Post processing. There's simply no free lunch.

_________________

如果係討論一部DLSR 或者部DC 於ISO 800 以上嘅情況, 我都覺得係. 但一部DC 頂晒籠可以用ISO200, 400 時己經又散又起格好大NOISE, 咁係咪攪好啲個CCD 或者自己個處理器會更加直接同大躍進呢?
一支28MM F1.9 同F2.4 係咁細塊CCD 度又係咪會有咁大優勢同好嘅影嚮呢?
可唔可以改善部機嘅NOISE 先呢? E-P1 一樣ISO 400 就有幾大NOISE, 但出面啲人買佢或將會買嘅人有幾多會去考慮呢? 咁又有幾多人買咗之後因為發覺原來都幾多NOISE 而有唔開心呢或者失望呢?
我唔係要求高ISO 到ISO 1600, 3200之類, 我只係要一部起碼ISO400 都可以有正常好嘅表現就得.
一部頂晒籠影ISO200 相嘅DC, 我相信買佢或者用過佢嘅人會覺得合情合理又正常又無投訴囉!

_________________
I LOVE ALFA ROMEO

Well, before complaining, then let's just wait till there is real field photo from this camera ... for real, I've found old GR-D and GR-D-II Photo at ISO 400 perfectly OK. provided one set the parameter right. With so many , I've found the problem leis not with the camera but the control ... Its usually a case of too much sharpening together with too high a saturation ...

_________________

用 $5 筒過期菲林，我插枝八枚玉落去影出黎 d 相都唔會好左o架

對 Ricoh 機仔已經冇乜期望 lu

_________________
Lo Fan

http://www2.lofan.net
http://www.lofan.net

As always usages vs expectation, design vs demand ...

_________________