CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週四 28 3月 24 19:41:11

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 8 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
 文章主題 : Samsung NX100
文章發表於 : 週二 14 9月 10 14:55:22 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
Oh well , Samsung made the EVIL of a Ricoh GRD .... 20mm/2.8 pancake , now that's talking

http://www.dpreview.com/previews/samsungnx100/

圖檔

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週日 26 9月 10 10:19:34 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
and

圖檔

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 27 9月 10 22:08:03 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
除了Premier 的那支85mm和 Super Wide Pancake
真係無邊支有興趣。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 28 9月 10 08:46:06 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
I differs with that .. the 30mm is already the best among all mirrorless pancakes so far, and the new 20mm is going to be very useful coverage. The 60 Macro and the 85 made the setup complete on the long side, and the 16 Pancake take the wide side. For fix focal user, this is pretty decent nominal coverage. So giving the zoom some choice made sense.

After that, it would be more specialized lens liek real long tele and Ultra wide , and those simply cannot be compact any more .. Since the system is ( at the moment ) still centered to be compact ( for all mirrorless ) the notion to fill that setup is logical.

Samsung is siort of like Sony and Panasonic .. many question their capability when entering the photography market, but they are pretty big and having the resource and the knowhow. Its just about if they put their effort to it. Sony did that pretty good ( but with some mishap along the way ) Panasonic kind of OK , Now its Samsung's turn ... :roll:

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 28 9月 10 09:39:18 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
因為同之前吹的好有分別,所以有些失望︰-
Schneider Kreuznach
Samsung Schneider Lens lineup
2010
15mm f/2.3 Super-Angulon
21mm f/2 Super-Angulon
35mm f/1.4 Xenon
55mm f/1.4 Xenon
2011
90mm f/1.8 Tele-Xenar
70mm f/2.8 Claron (Macro)


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 28 9月 10 10:53:36 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週五 27 1月 06 12:09:10
文章: 550
來自: Singapore
Actually what is the biggest advantage of this type of digital cam over DSLR? Size to me is not an important factor. How about focusing accuracy? When use with adaptors need stop down metering things like that?

_________________
Rolleiflex 3003, SL2000F - SONY Alpha7R 1/2/4. A1
Carl Zeiss C/Y T* - QBM HFT - ZM T* - ZF T* - Batis T* - Otus T* - Loxia T*
Sony. Zeiss 16-35/4 T* G200600 GM100400 GM600
http://www.fuwen.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 28 9月 10 17:59:29 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
G2 Lover 寫:
因為同之前吹的好有分別,所以有些失望︰-
Schneider Kreuznach
Samsung Schneider Lens lineup
2010
15mm f/2.3 Super-Angulon
21mm f/2 Super-Angulon
35mm f/1.4 Xenon
55mm f/1.4 Xenon
2011
90mm f/1.8 Tele-Xenar
70mm f/2.8 Claron (Macro)


I think you mistaken rumor with real product announcement, those rumored lens were never ever confirmed, not by Samsung, and not by Schneider. there is at then heated debate over such news, but as every such thing. Its usually just hyped up wishful thinking by some zealous users. Not much as the like of Leica R10, or another Kodak FF DSLR

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 28 9月 10 18:05:53 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
fuwen 寫:
Actually what is the biggest advantage of this type of digital cam over DSLR? Size to me is not an important factor. How about focusing accuracy? When use with adaptors need stop down metering things like that?


You need stop down metering with adepted lens whether mirroless or DSLR .. that is not the issue.

The advantage of Mirrorless is sort of the same as SLR vs RF in film days, the register and lack of anything in between media ? shutter and lens means lens can be designed to perform to a higher level, be made faster, be made slimmer, utilize some optical design that's not possible in a SLR type setup or any combination of such. Thje Samsung 30mm/2.0 lens is a fine example. Its fast, slim, and can use optical design that cater to the form.

focusing Accuracy is not about the mount or the form factor. Its the control of motor and AF mechanism and that goes with any type of AF canmera. CDAF / PDAF discussion is plenty on the net so I won't repeat. But accuracy as accuracy goes ... they both work fine these days and both having their problems.

Remember DSLR or SLt or Mirrorless is just different form of camera build. That does not mean one is better or worse. What manifest is certain form is better at certain need ... that's why I say Sony had the most harmonious setup as far as camera goes ( they need lens now )

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 8 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 9 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作