CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週三 22 11月 17 14:59:59

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 50 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 上一頁  1234  下一頁
發表人 內容
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 28 9月 11 23:59:45 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
lofan 寫:
初步構思 Nex7 + LA-EA2 + ZA 16-80

一件既有, 一件十月出, 一件十一月出, 非常方便找數 :lol: :lol: :lol:


點解唔見你提吓部X-100的?
又用黎跌落水定係入雪堆雪藏?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 29 9月 11 07:29:10 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週六 24 12月 05 01:20:48
文章: 2994
來自: 北海道
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

_________________
專用冷門機、副廠鏡、副廠燈的
Lo Fan
http://photo.lofan.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週四 29 9月 11 21:55:04 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!


看來你部機唔入雪櫃都已經係在床下底! :P
呢部機,喜歡的好喜歡,但也有人插到佢體無完膚! :roll:
我想佢一日未有Interchange Lens Model我都唔會考慮!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週五 30 9月 11 00:09:28 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週五 28 11月 03 23:54:34
文章: 13672
來自: Hong Kong SAR
LA-EA2 Unboxing:

http://forum.xitek.com/showthread.php?threadid=919462

_________________
Best Regards,
圖檔
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週五 30 9月 11 07:28:40 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週六 24 12月 05 01:20:48
文章: 2994
來自: 北海道
Terry Sham 寫:


唔知幾時出呢,好心急添!

_________________
專用冷門機、副廠鏡、副廠燈的
Lo Fan
http://photo.lofan.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 01 10月 11 00:50:41 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 25 8月 04 22:43:48
文章: 4793
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

會唔會平讓 :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
我很窮,但我愛contax!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 01 10月 11 08:08:59 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週六 24 12月 05 01:20:48
文章: 2994
來自: 北海道
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

會唔會平讓 :lol: :lol: :lol:


七千五你殺唔殺?

有意者請pm

_________________
專用冷門機、副廠鏡、副廠燈的
Lo Fan
http://photo.lofan.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週日 02 10月 11 16:04:51 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 25 8月 04 22:43:48
文章: 4793
lofan0 寫:
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

會唔會平讓 :lol: :lol: :lol:


七千五你殺唔殺?

有意者請pm

有冇掉過落雪先? :shock: :shock:

_________________
我很窮,但我愛contax!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週日 02 10月 11 18:29:09 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週三 12 11月 03 19:31:39
文章: 26313
來自: Hong Kong
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

會唔會平讓 :lol: :lol: :lol:


七千五你殺唔殺?

有意者請pm

有冇掉過落雪先? :shock: :shock:


未見過雪

出過門零次。

_________________
Lo Fan
圖檔
http://www2.lofan.net
http://www.lofan.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 03 10月 11 00:07:07 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
lofan 寫:
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
King 寫:
lofan0 寫:
係喎唔講唔記得我有部X100喎!

會唔會平讓 :lol: :lol: :lol:


七千五你殺唔殺?

有意者請pm

有冇掉過落雪先? :shock: :shock:


未見過雪

出過門零次。


可唔可以講唔死無用!數碼野就係咁.........唉!
叫我影RAW,仲要千幾萬像一張!真係汁到想死。
數碼幾百萬像對我來講好足夠。
通常我用得數碼一張起兩張止, 只會用RAW。
反為Film,比錢人Scan同沖,快靚正!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 03 10月 11 18:20:12 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
If you always need to do a lot of PP with the RAW, then that means you have not learn how to properly shoot RAW with your said camera ( together with your said RAW developer ). :roll:

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 03 10月 11 22:24:52 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
FR 寫:
If you always need to do a lot of PP with the RAW, then that means you have not learn how to properly shoot RAW with your said camera ( together with your said RAW developer ). :roll:


正正相反,汁相係我最唔喜歡的東西。
不過問題係出左係我部機係超級唔準AWB。
在RAW中我只改三東西︰-
1. Exposure (+ or - 1級,多過一級多數唔會要那張相了,反正汁出來都會有問題)
2. 用Dropper找白位做WB
3. Sharpness and Unsharp Mask
其他的我完全都唔會Move,因為唔得閒學同唔得閒理佢地。
但就以上三個個人都覺得好煩。
我係用Raw Therapee


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 03 10月 11 22:27:18 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
FR 寫:
If you always need to do a lot of PP with the RAW, then that means you have not learn how to properly shoot RAW with your said camera ( together with your said RAW developer ). :roll:


仲有汁到想死係我想像出來的。
我用Raw Therapee汁張600萬像部腦已經好慢,千多萬像我想部腦會係定格囉。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 04 10月 11 15:18:04 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
G2 Lover 寫:
FR 寫:
If you always need to do a lot of PP with the RAW, then that means you have not learn how to properly shoot RAW with your said camera ( together with your said RAW developer ). :roll:


正正相反,汁相係我最唔喜歡的東西。
不過問題係出左係我部機係超級唔準AWB。
在RAW中我只改三東西︰-
1. Exposure (+ or - 1級,多過一級多數唔會要那張相了,反正汁出來都會有問題)
2. 用Dropper找白位做WB
3. Sharpness and Unsharp Mask
其他的我完全都唔會Move,因為唔得閒學同唔得閒理佢地。
但就以上三個個人都覺得好煩。
我係用Raw Therapee


Well, if you know the AWB is not correct and still using it, then you are, by default, already using a wrong set of data. Setting for the right ISO and right WB is the first step in getting a proper capture anyway. I use RAW Therapee also. Its speed is never its one of its virtue.

Still, like all RAW developer of quality, there is ways to save developing parameters and re-use it for development. Its in long term the way to develop one's own set of these.

Still, if each and every shoot need loads of time to get just all these 3 character right, then its not just the camera and RAW developer. You probably are not aware that you have not tune the whole workflow and equipment to work as a whole. Like I stated before, setting proper ISo and WB is only the start ( providing you have a proper lens and camera ) ; Proper exposure is a matter of judgment and learning to know what your camera can do at that ISO and that WB, and setting accordingly. Then sharpness ( actually there is no single quantitative element call sharpness ) and USM also is a matter of how the camera / lens / ISO / WB / NR ( hardware ) / RAW de-mosaic yields ... If you have work out the workflow, then it should not take that loads of time as you've stated.

I re-iterate, the best part of digital is providing the control back to the actual photographer, but take control one must do to get the result if demanding. Its simply the motto.

BTW, whether you like to do the RAW development or not is one thing, but whether you need to do is another. what I am saying is if you consistently need to do loads of time just to correct these 3 element, then you have not work out your particular workflow or there is discripency in and between the element of seeing, capturing, and developing the image

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 05 10月 11 01:00:33 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
FR 寫:
G2 Lover 寫:
FR 寫:
If you always need to do a lot of PP with the RAW, then that means you have not learn how to properly shoot RAW with your said camera ( together with your said RAW developer ). :roll:


正正相反,汁相係我最唔喜歡的東西。
不過問題係出左係我部機係超級唔準AWB。
在RAW中我只改三東西︰-
1. Exposure (+ or - 1級,多過一級多數唔會要那張相了,反正汁出來都會有問題)
2. 用Dropper找白位做WB
3. Sharpness and Unsharp Mask
其他的我完全都唔會Move,因為唔得閒學同唔得閒理佢地。
但就以上三個個人都覺得好煩。
我係用Raw Therapee


Well, if you know the AWB is not correct and still using it, then you are, by default, already using a wrong set of data. Setting for the right ISO and right WB is the first step in getting a proper capture anyway. I use RAW Therapee also. Its speed is never its one of its virtue.

Still, like all RAW developer of quality, there is ways to save developing parameters and re-use it for development. Its in long term the way to develop one's own set of these.

Still, if each and every shoot need loads of time to get just all these 3 character right, then its not just the camera and RAW developer. You probably are not aware that you have not tune the whole workflow and equipment to work as a whole. Like I stated before, setting proper ISo and WB is only the start ( providing you have a proper lens and camera ) ; Proper exposure is a matter of judgment and learning to know what your camera can do at that ISO and that WB, and setting accordingly. Then sharpness ( actually there is no single quantitative element call sharpness ) and USM also is a matter of how the camera / lens / ISO / WB / NR ( hardware ) / RAW de-mosaic yields ... If you have work out the workflow, then it should not take that loads of time as you've stated.

I re-iterate, the best part of digital is providing the control back to the actual photographer, but take control one must do to get the result if demanding. Its simply the motto.

BTW, whether you like to do the RAW development or not is one thing, but whether you need to do is another. what I am saying is if you consistently need to do loads of time just to correct these 3 element, then you have not work out your particular workflow or there is discripency in and between the element of seeing, capturing, and developing the image


ISO 同WB最基本日光、陰天及閃燈我都Of Course知發生咁事。
Manual tone WB of couse even DCAM仔都有啦!
因為我用Net Book 仲得個512MBytes 行Windows 7咁你明我講咩啦!
時間係用在等...............唔係用在那三個Steps
我唔係連入門野都唔識 :D
仲有我部E-1最多咪可以在日光日白或用腳影。
Exposure一長過1Second又或高過ISO400,真係神仙都難救。
咁點解成日都唔多準呢?因為我唔用Zuiko鏡,我全部Contax鏡!仲主要係AEG都唔係設計比CCD的........當然唔準啦!
咁你可能會問點解唔買過部新的DSLR?
原因有三︰-
1. 數碼我唔想花時間在Post Processing,所以唔係主力,唔想投資咁多包括時間。
2. Contax係我最喜歡的System,所以先上來吹水,唔會放棄,咁一定唔可以玩SONY, Pentax and Nikon.........咁部E-1又其實OK.
3. 菲林用錢比人地做晒個Post Processing,乾手淨腳,無咩唔好。
所以我接受90%時間玩Contax and Film
Then 10% E-1 + slow Raw + time for post-processing...........
用新機新鏡投資五六萬買多個System太貴了。不如出支55mm f/1.2好過!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 50 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 上一頁  1234  下一頁

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 1 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作