CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

Samsung NX10, 18-55/3.5-5.6

All default camera setting, RAW to JPEG conversion by Samsung RAW converter (this is actually a rebadged SilkyPix as bundled in the kit, no adjustment at all........)

Re-sized to 25% in photoshop

#1



#2



#3



#4



#5



#6



#7



#8



#9



#10



#11



#12



Please comment!

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

very nice!!!!!

started to make your "adopter" yet??

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

haha.........hope that I should be able to give some surprise here next week........

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

Yes as you said, the color is good.

_________________
會計
* * * * * *
鯨魚愛Zeiss

試過部機,支餅鏡幾掂,對焦比較慢,delete張相都慢

18-55 對焦算幾快 (應該是因為內對焦的關係, 而 30mm 餅鏡就係全組鏡對焦)

而 save 相慢的原因應該是........NX10 的 RAW file 大到成 28mb, 再加 fine JPEG 每影一張大約 5mb........

每次 read / write 33mb 都真係幾甘

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

Arri vision?

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion

28MB should be uncompressed raw, is there a compressed raw mode?

No........

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

Modification to M-mount confirmed to be not feasible today.....

Still it would be a better platform than M4/3 for Canon FD, Contarex, Alpa, 35mm Arri lenses in ST mount etc

May be someone would produce a replaceable mount for M-lenses.... (like Nikon F replacement mount for Leica R lenses)

Sadly due to internal body restriction M lenses with rear element larger than 23mm in diameter would not be able to fit as well.......

_________________

Wah
理事 - Board of Members
www.flickr.com/dicksonlau

Considering all those M lens with protruding and big rear element groups are classic lens design and deliver highly angled oblique light ray entry angles. Its positively better not to had that large a sensor for them with digital. Even Leica advice against using those lens even on their M8 ( not to mention FF M9 or so ... )

_________________

To me I feel the Samsung is a better buy the OM.
The Kit lens for OM Micro 4/3 really a CRAP lens.
However, the look of Samsung really not appealing!
And to me if I am using Micro 4/3 or any other similiar interchangable lens DCAM I will for sure STICK with AUTOFOCUS.
Why to MOUNT a big mount and play slow manual focus and most likely the CMOS need much effort in toneing the colour in RAW software.
I am a VERY LAZY person so I have to admit if I don't put time on the develop part I have to accept the picture quality will be SO SO.
Auto-focus to me is important for small Micro 4/3.
BTW, I agree FR's saying for the physical limitiation for those lens DESIGN for FILM.
I also wonder recently for Zeiss ZF, ZE, ZS are they designing for just CMOS or are they balancing the design for both film and digital......must be something different in the coating and the lens arrangement maybe............
So if I keep on playing film I will stick with Contax system not to mention most lens are now dropping price SO QUICK and very reasonable.