G2 Lover 寫:
I am wondering why most people don't consider EOS Full frame.
Is it because the CMOS got no improvement?
It is quite sucessful for SONY; back a decade ago; when DSLR is common; no one will ever consider Minolta nor SONY but go CANON, CANON.
Now; people try to avoid Canon.......
My preference if Fuji got FF.
Fujifilm then NEX then Canon.
Suppose that FUJI can take Contax.
I love Fuji more but too bad that it will not have the FF in the nearest future.
Before, I was using Canon 40D and then 5D2 with my C/Y lenses. Personally, I don't accept EVF and perhaps I have used Leica before and I love its OVF. However, as I am getting old (no kidding), I finally surrendered by selling my 5D2 and going to get an A7. The main reason is not in terms of quality consideration.
It is only because I found that with the 5D2 (or other DSLR), I always opened to the largest aperture to focus and then stopped down right before I took the picture. For steady subjects, it was still okay. However, it has been such a pain to take photos of my little boy. With an EVF, this is no more problem. I can stop down the lens and the EVF will compensate the brightness.
Of course, if the EVF can be improved such as the coming Fuji XT1, it will be great. However, it will become a moeny matter consideration.
_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert