CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

想請教一下

其實TMax同 Ilford Detla係咪都係差不多的東西，市面有沒有Lab真係仲會用Ilford ID11來沖，如果都係要用KodakD-76，咁其實係咪用番Kodak好些？

因為用-76 都始終唔係專for Ilford，用的Chemical唔同，出來的效果可能冇咁好，有沒有影響呢？還是影響其實都好細。

又想問吓，Kodak Tri-X係咪因比T-Max的flexibility高，其Push的Range係咪會高些，仲有什麼好處，唔明點解大部份的Pro. 都係用Tri-X。

謝謝！

大家又知唔知有沒有平的大陸黑白菲林係OEM Ilford 或Kodak？

1. D-76 and ID11 are essentially the same thing. i.e. they have the same formula. So, your first few questions are not questions at all.

2. Tri-x has more latitude for exposure. Whereas TMY, like deltas, are more demanding on exposure and development. Thus, would you use TMY or Tri-x for street photography as lighting condition changes from place to place? Another reason, Tri-x gives good tone more easily (if one is skillful enough, he gets any tone from any film, theoretically) and more importantly, some photogs like the grains in and softer look of Tri-x.

Basically, the BEST way to understand a film is to exposure, develop and print several rolls of it.

_________________
Would you choose the Rollei or the hassle?

Thanks for your reply........I understand more now.

I am done playing with

Ilford Delta 100
Ilford Delta 400
XP 5 too.

However I hardly see any diff. on small film.......as I didn't push.

I think when I receive back my XP5 on monday I can see notiable GRAINS size diff.

I just do scanning in Photo CDs..........maybe that is why no notiable diff. Beside I think without pushing. The grains of Delta 400 are very fine too. Delta is SUPER FINE.

Again I need to do things in BLACK ROOM in order to see the really diff.

Black & White really need Black & White method to taste.

But it is expensive..........SIGH.