FR 寫:
G2 Lover 寫:
在數碼年代,一年都已經係好長的時間!
Leica 電子唔強,所以講的係光學同History
但係基本Range finder的好處都變成壞處...........而且好難突破!
.....
但係基本的Physical問題係沒有做個東西,或者係我唔知,因為我唔係Software Engineer。我總係覺得Canon公司已成為Software Engineer的世界.............或Programmer.
Well for sure and that is Why Leica is this state of affair and its not the first time either. Their entry into film SLR with the Leicaflex and their first TTL metering as in the M5 is in any way a relfection of their rather lackluster way of doing thing or rather anything that is not the Opto-Mechanical.
Still, I debate the saying. No Digital came along a LOT in this last 10 year. And what is it mean by the "基本的Physical問題" I fail to see any real issue here. I think people mistook the media and capturing as the camera. No they are not. Back in film days, Canon nor Nikon do not made film which is the capturing media and they do not made any darkroom related product. The Sensor, software and todays various electronic associated with that imaging part is the Medium in Digital realm. Can we really criticize Canon for that. These Mfr at least had the know and the will to forge forward. In a sense Leica neither had the might nor the knowing which is where they fail.
None of these had anything to do with " 基本的Physical問題 " which I suppose one mean the camera. No in digital, the camera is not a camera anymore as in traditional sense. Back in film days, its the platform to hold the shutter and work with the lens to facilitate capturing and that's about it. It need a view and focusing mechanism and some form to wind the film but Its independent of the film or the darkroom process.
In todays digital capturing platform, the imaging media ( the sensor ) is part of the camera, making at least the capturing and initial A/D signaling part of the system. One thus, & must, see the DSLR/ Digital RF body as such.
I think some might not want to hear this, but no, the limitation is not on the media or the sensor technology. If its really that bad, most people will be using film still, at least all the PRO, that is certainly not the case. What I see is people unwilling to accept the fact that digital is not film and they simply behave and work differently and require different way of usage.
Leica try to merge the medium with the opto-mechanical of the M series. Which when properly done I would see no wrong. What Leica fail is they made a bad job out of it and place expectation way too high ( and certainly price also )
I will say in this digital age.
"MIXTURE OF DIGITAL PARTS" is the term I will say for any manufactuer in whatever production.
For Canon they have all the technology or same CHIPS, IC board etc. for all of their products no matter CAMERAS, PRINTERS, SCANNERS.
I didn't see this is a BIG movement as basically they are all the same.
INPUT, Analysis, OUTPUT (In between RAM, CPU, CHIPS Calculation, Matix Analysis, Programming)
Just MIXTURE OF DIGITAL PARTS and this is not anything interesting at all in sense of ART and Innovation.
And I am sure they had develop the whole line for next few years or so. Making BIGGER LCDs larger pixel, software update and dig $$$ from crazy users.
Take Canon as an example
EOS 10, 20 30 there is really no need to have EOS 10D or 20D as 30D already been designed and set it back to EOS 10D (making the lifespan longer).