CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週五 19 4月 24 19:35:17

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 20 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 12  下一頁
發表人 內容
 文章主題 : 想問曬相~~~
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 02:16:39 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週日 14 12月 03 21:11:05
文章: 1758
Dear Friends,

我記得以前 ar Sir 教.....
At the End 要曬相就用 負片影相,
唔洗曬相, 用幻燈片 就用 幻燈機 睇,
唔好 用幻燈片 曬相, 唔靚 !!!!

但 有位"大C" 話我係傻仔... 唔識唔好扮識......
唔同層次就唔好出聲...... 幻燈片 曬相 靚多多.....

乜用幻燈片曬 大相 (20x30) 會比用負片 好? :roll:

唔明~~~~~~~ :?: :?: :?:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 : Re: 想問曬相~~~
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 02:57:21 
事務局長
事務局長

註冊時間: 週日 09 11月 03 03:42:29
文章: 12296
Hello Kit 寫:
Dear Friends,

我記得以前 ar Sir 教.....
At the End 要曬相就用 負片影相,
唔洗曬相, 用幻燈片 就用 幻燈機 睇,
唔好 用幻燈片 曬相, 唔靚 !!!!

但 有位"大C" 話我係傻仔... 唔識唔好扮識......
唔同層次就唔好出聲...... 幻燈片 曬相 靚多多.....

乜用幻燈片曬 大相 (20x30) 會比用負片 好? :roll:

唔明~~~~~~~ :?: :?: :?:


What kind of "大C" he is ar?? Theorically, he is right. However, in the real world, he is wrong. Now a days, the top end neg film can provide very fine gain, very good contrast. Also from the cost point of view, a 20x30 print out from Slide to photo is almost a double to neg film. I would say, if you find a good master on helping you to print out the photo, the enlargement print should not be so different in between using Neg film or Pos. film for photo enlargement.

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 09:47:39 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週日 14 12月 03 21:11:05
文章: 1758
http://www.imageislive.com/forum/showth ... ge=1&pp=15

"大C" 話 I'm "個種想吋人, 又吋唔起... 句句係度頂住晒" wooo.....
:roll: :roll: :roll:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 10:13:45 
顧問 (榮譽)
顧問 (榮譽)

註冊時間: 週六 08 11月 03 09:21:23
文章: 1493
forget it la, He has good "Gammer" ma


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 10:15:12 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週四 09 12月 04 11:11:41
文章: 2202
來自: 香港
manyung 寫:
forget it la, He has good "Gammer" ma


:lol: :lol: :lol:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 10:21:26 
顧問 (榮譽)
顧問 (榮譽)

註冊時間: 週六 08 11月 03 09:21:23
文章: 1493
Some people even said the quality of Digital photos much better than film's. And also, Japanese lenses much better than germany's. Every people have different point of view.


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 05 2月 05 11:04:02 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週日 14 12月 03 21:11:05
文章: 1758
sing 寫:
manyung 寫:
forget it la, He has good "Gammer" ma


:lol: :lol: :lol:


:lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm OK !!! But really want to know the true ! :D


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 08 2月 05 16:10:51 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 19 1月 05 21:30:47
文章: 783
其實我都想問下..
如果影左slide,
之後scan出尼去晒,
比較於直接晒負片,
邊樣效果會好d?
分別大唔大?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 08 2月 05 16:23:08 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週三 26 5月 04 18:33:58
文章: 3295
來自: Vesalius
manyung 寫:
Some people even said the quality of Digital photos much better than film's. And also, Japanese lenses much better than germany's. Every people have different point of view.


Some people even said the quality of Digital photos much better than film's
<-
以下係個人主觀愚見
質素?邊方面既質素先?好多數碼相都勁FLAT,出到光就出唔到暗喎
同埋色既野,有D係數碼野唔係咁易做到既
仲要,如果只計最終殘存數量既,數碼機可以好易去贏
(打個唔太岩既比喻,你比足夠既架生我,我同你打千幾二千張
要搵十零廿張似樣既靚既有幾難者?MEMORY又唔駛錢既,換彈夾頻率又低,錯左仲可以即時知咩錯即改)

_________________
N機唔係臘鴨 N鏡唔係垃圾
家陣係人玩機 唔係機玩番人


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 08 2月 05 22:30:03 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週一 21 6月 04 15:57:05
文章: 80
From my experience, I never get a good quality slide print out from any pro lab comparing with negative. If I really want to print slide, I perfer scan it and print it by ink jet.

_________________
任君多美麗富裕到最後平頭

http://www.fotop.net/eerick


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 09 2月 05 01:06:52 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週日 14 12月 03 21:11:05
文章: 1758
東 寫:
其實我都想問下..
如果影左slide,
之後scan出尼去晒,
比較於直接晒負片,
邊樣效果會好d?
分別大唔大?


我未試過影左slide去曬!

比我就搵間 OutPut 同我 Scan 夠 8R size/300dpi 先出相! :wink:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 09 2月 05 02:14:40 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週五 06 8月 04 02:36:46
文章: 5314
來自: 那星
eerick 寫:
From my experience, I never get a good quality slide print out from any pro lab comparing with negative. If I really want to print slide, I perfer scan it and print it by ink jet.


I had chances to see Cibachrome's 16x20inch print out from a 645 slide..... it was excellent that it looked as good as the original slide.... the shadow details seemed did not lose..... 8)

_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert
圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 09 2月 05 02:20:25 
事務局長
事務局長

註冊時間: 週日 09 11月 03 03:42:29
文章: 12296
yualbert 寫:
eerick 寫:
From my experience, I never get a good quality slide print out from any pro lab comparing with negative. If I really want to print slide, I perfer scan it and print it by ink jet.


I had chances to see Cibachrome's 16x20inch print out from a 645 slide..... it was excellent that it looked as good as the original slide.... the shadow details seemed did not lose..... 8)


Albert, as you can see my 10x10 enlargement photo, the neg film can provide excellent shadow detail too!! To me, really make no different but the enlargment price of Pos. film is extremely expensive is compare...

_________________
事務局長

Damn, my Calon Segur heart fall in love with Haut Brion


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 09 2月 05 02:27:52 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週五 06 8月 04 02:36:46
文章: 5314
來自: 那星
vincenthoy28 寫:
yualbert 寫:
eerick 寫:
From my experience, I never get a good quality slide print out from any pro lab comparing with negative. If I really want to print slide, I perfer scan it and print it by ink jet.


I had chances to see Cibachrome's 16x20inch print out from a 645 slide..... it was excellent that it looked as good as the original slide.... the shadow details seemed did not lose..... 8)


Albert, as you can see my 10x10 enlargement photo, the neg film can provide excellent shadow detail too!! To me, really make no different but the enlargment price of Pos. film is extremely expensive is compare...


I have to say that I have experienced "direct print", "radiance select" and "Cibachrome".... Cibachrome is the best among three while direct print is the worst in terms of re-producing the original silde quality.....

Too bad the even Color Six does not have radiance select now.... and Cibachrome is not available in any lab in HK now....

I always say unless we can do a side-by-side test on slide and negative, otherwise we may probably not be able to see the difference.... 8)

_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert
圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 09 2月 05 09:38:11 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週三 12 11月 03 19:31:39
文章: 26328
來自: Hong Kong
哈哈~

年初一流流就有火藥性話題,我鍾意!

_________________
Lo Fan
圖檔
http://www2.lofan.net
http://www.lofan.net


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 20 篇文章 ]  前往頁數 12  下一頁

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 27 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作