CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

發現佢的Plastic Parts都同A100一樣咁雞！
人地Showroom的機可能人流沒有咁多，但係Sony DSLR的真係十足玩具。
今天看是甩皮甩骨...........勁唔耐用。
Canon同Olympus的都未見過有咁的問題。
金工又唔得.........就算有zeiss我都完全唔會考慮。

sony

http://www.dchome.net/viewthread.php?ti ... a=page%3D1

sony倒緊自己米 一係就唔jow比人睇 show就要show最好

post a photo??

要得就唔好浪費,
養大隻小動物拎去賣.

Well, I am not sure about this, but even in previous incarnation, Minolta's SLR is pretty bad for their exterior finish in term of those covering. With only 1 or 2 models its simply to me too early to tell how the whole Alpha would go about.

ON the other hand, I think Sony's Metal work is quite good, providing you are paying for it. much like Canon / Nikon's lens lineup. The economy choice is well, economy, and mid range can only be termed so so .... ( in term of construction ), this had been similar with Minolta, and I would wager with Sony also. I had handle the new Sony both body and lens and I had to say for their current retail price, the lens is comparable with competitions, and the body also.

The Only company I know of that actually deliver quality construction in reasonable price bracket is neither one of them ...

_________________

我看的都係最Cheap的鏡.......所以唔可以作準。
不過金工(Low profile lens)感覺好單薄好似係一Hit就會有Dent(都係主觀感受)。我地用開Contax Lens 同Hood的對金工係有些要求。

反為一些其他Cheap Cheap用Plastic Lens有時手感唔好但基本唔會出現Dent的問題。

依加有唔少人買dslr當係玩具
數碼機唔洗耐用,好多人用唔夠2年就買過部.
$ony睇得出依加0既dslr市場係,
名牌相機同鏡頭係身份象徵,(睇0下紅圈鏡幾好賣就知啦)
買機0既人大多係"玩玩具"多過研究攝影技巧.

如果A900都係咁, Sony alpha都幾難突圍.

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事