CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

睇過D28-70 f2.8和24-70 f2.8 AB之後,
24-70肯定邊位靚過28-70.......
其實24-70有一支我覺得唔錯又用過.
sigma 24-70 f2.8
散景靚.成像不俗........
最緊要係.
2nd hand 2k有交易

為左慳錢，我可以繼續同自己講，我要等到有 AF ZF 先買.... 其實講真有得幾難，騰龍同SIGMA都係咁造嫁啦

_________________
專用冷門機、副廠鏡、副廠燈的
Lo Fan
http://photo.lofan.net

恐怕無可能.......

Its not impossible, just that it do not made market sense at all ... why bother when Nikon is already doing a better job at this sector, not to mention all the option from Tamron , Sigma, and Tokina.

_________________

Nikon is doing a better job at the AF area, I agree. But if zeiss come into the picture, launching some kind of AF ZF, I am sure lots of guys here will have second thought.

點唔 MAKE SENSE 法呀？MF鏡頭市場有幾大？AF鏡頭市場又有幾大？反而我覺得人地大過我勁過我的AREA我就唔做的話先叫 DOESNT MAKE SENSE AT ALL

再者，NIKON 自己都大把AF鏡冇內置MOTOR，用返NIKON 機身本來就有的 AF 功能，並唔牽涉 NIKON IS ALREADY DOING A BETTER JOB, INSTEAD, IT'S MAKING USE OF NIKON'S ADVANTAGE

_________________
專用冷門機、副廠鏡、副廠燈的
Lo Fan
http://photo.lofan.net

Sony 消息話不會貴過$12000

出奇地平！

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

無錯.
儲$$中,
並已預留一支.

I am saying making market sense, nothing to do with the quality of the lens nor its performance. To fashion AF lens architecture would demand a much higher batch volume to justify the manufacture, R&D, and considering Zeiss's aimed sector, that is not going to made good enough reason to go for one unless they expect to long term production / stocking. Which at this moment looks highly unlikely for Zeiss.

On the other hand, it is quite clear that all the independents ( Sigma, Tamron, & Tokina ) are not interested in MF lens, even Nikon off with it. So MF lens is really a wide open field for anyone willing to inject some quality product. Leica can do that ( if they are willing to part with their FACE ) Zeiss had no problem with that. Zeiss been always providing lens for other Mfr anyway. Business wise, MF lens lineup is far easier to do ( R&D, manufacture , stocking ) and higher profit yield than AF. So why not stick with this success solution anyway ..

In business, its not just about which product the customer want, but also which customer want that can yield the highest benefit in ledger to the Mfr.

_________________

Vario-Elmarit-R 35-70mm/f2.8 ASPH的對手終於來了：

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

反而我會咁諗，其他副廠唔做 AF，更加唔會有人買，所以做 AF 自然係佢地出路。相反 Zeiss 仲有條件可以要 d 客就佢，而唔係佢就 d 客，所以就算明知市場細，都仲有得做。

同埋我又想問，如果只係造一枝Nikon AF 鏡，連 D 鏡都唔係，總之只係最 basic 最舊的 AF 鏡，R&D 多得幾多錢，生產、stocking 又多得幾多錢？

同埋我都想聽其他大大講講：大家係 MF 同 AF 之間因為 Zeiss 冇適合的 AF 選擇，所以惟有揀 MF，定係係因為大家本身鍾意 MF，所以根本唔考慮 AF呢？

_________________
Lo Fan

http://www2.lofan.net
http://www.lofan.net

我是本身鍾意MF的操作, 但又喜歡AF鏡的新Design, 例如N及ZA系列.
所以我真係好鍾愛ZF, 遺憾的是沒有Zoom及Tele鏡.

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

每次想起 FF + T* + SSM 心裡都會叫爽!

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事

MF is chosen because MF (the mount itself, probably) design patent is in the public domain.

That's what I heard.