CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週四 28 3月 24 21:23:18

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 10 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
文章發表於 : 週一 15 9月 08 10:31:01 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週五 28 11月 03 23:54:34
文章: 13675
來自: Hong Kong SAR
時移世易, Leica開始玩大光圈, Zeiss開始玩細光圈:

最近發表的Leica鏡頭:
Noctilux-M 50mm f0.95 ASPH.
Summilux-M 21mm f1.4 ASPH.
Summilux-M 24mm f1.4 ASPH.

最近發表的Zeiss鏡頭:
C Biogon T *4.5/21 ZM
C Biogon T* 2.8/35 ZM
Tele-Tessar T* 4/85 ZM

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事
圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 15 9月 08 11:09:23 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週日 19 6月 05 02:08:45
文章: 409
1.4 for 21mm? :shock:

_________________
Would you choose the Rollei or the hassle?


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 16 9月 08 12:58:32 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
好名顯Leica係想用大光圈留客。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 : Well, not really....
文章發表於 : 週二 16 9月 08 15:17:44 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
One must ask if one really need those fast lens ... It seems to me Leica had simply yet again lost touch with the real world, and simply refuse to properly develop product instead. Its clearly they simply cannot manufacture, and market proper their lens in competition with real world. This is reflected in their price vs that of the ZM.

These lens is more a matter of over engineer for the sack of it, hoping to out gun others so they can maintain high profile sell at great price. the reality though is if one actually need or could work proper with those lens. Which IMHO is counter to the whole M concept,

Betwenn 0.95 and 1.4 , is that really that much of a difference, now the 1.4 21 & 24 might be great, but no amount of tweaking can allow one to focus proper on anything other than subject in a distance. Especially not on the M8 with its reduced effective RF Base/vf mag.

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 16 9月 08 17:20:16 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週五 06 8月 04 02:36:46
文章: 5314
來自: 那星
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:

_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert
圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 17 9月 08 12:01:57 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
yualbert 寫:
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:


老實講,玩得Leica的,除非要Match CCD Software,用舊鏡先係玩Leica的趣味。


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 17 9月 08 13:17:14 
幹事
幹事

註冊時間: 週五 28 11月 03 23:54:34
文章: 13675
來自: Hong Kong SAR
G2 Lover 寫:
yualbert 寫:
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:


老實講,玩得Leica的,除非要Match CCD Software,用舊鏡先係玩Leica的趣味。

正路就係, 不過我最近真係識好多人玩Leica係為左個紅圈的. :wink:

_________________
Best Regards,

Terry Shum
香港互聯網康泰時攝影會幹事
圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 17 9月 08 17:45:23 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週五 06 8月 04 02:36:46
文章: 5314
來自: 那星
G2 Lover 寫:
yualbert 寫:
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:


老實講,玩得Leica的,除非要Match CCD Software,用舊鏡先係玩Leica的趣味。


Very agree! 8)

_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert
圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 24 9月 08 15:41:42 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週日 09 11月 03 01:29:25
文章: 1165
yualbert 寫:
G2 Lover 寫:
yualbert 寫:
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:


老實講,玩得Leica的,除非要Match CCD Software,用舊鏡先係玩Leica的趣味。


Very agree! 8)


真係越舊越有味 :lol:


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週三 24 9月 08 16:30:11 
CONTAX CLUB 會員
CONTAX CLUB 會員

註冊時間: 週五 06 8月 04 02:36:46
文章: 5314
來自: 那星
Jesse 寫:
yualbert 寫:
G2 Lover 寫:
yualbert 寫:
FR,

I am with you and to me, another concern is $$$ issue. When the 2.5 aperture lenses introduced, it was more affordable to me. Well, but with these 1.4 and 0.95, it is really "can look far away and cannot play with them" la. :cry:


老實講,玩得Leica的,除非要Match CCD Software,用舊鏡先係玩Leica的趣味。


Very agree! 8)


真係越舊越有味 :lol:


Yeah and this apply to Zeiss as well. 8)

_________________
Please visit my photo gallery and your comments are always welcome!
I will add photos to it from time to time. Thank you!
http://www.flickr.com/people/yualbert
圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 10 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 14 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作