CONTAX CLUB Carl Zeiss 討論區

香港互聯網康泰時攝影會
現在的時間是 週四 28 3月 24 16:20:51

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時




發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 6 篇文章 ] 
發表人 內容
文章發表於 : 週一 30 3月 09 01:44:29 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09032 ... _canon.asp


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 30 3月 09 04:24:21 
討論區會員

註冊時間: 週一 14 2月 05 00:37:49
文章: 73
咁canon直得買的都只有17ts?!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週二 31 3月 09 23:56:02 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
Well, plenty of Canon's lens are good lens too, whether they suite the user is something else ... and for most who do not try to take control especially in these days of digital imaging. its hard for them to comprehend the understating performance of some of these ..

Still, I had yet to see some update of classic 18 to 21 mm lens remake/remodel/renew for todays need on FF DSLR , don;t think the Zoom or the T&S the same kind of lens though ...

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 04 4月 09 00:24:08 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
FR 寫:
Well, plenty of Canon's lens are good lens too, whether they suite the user is something else ... and for most who do not try to take control especially in these days of digital imaging. its hard for them to comprehend the understating performance of some of these ..

Still, I had yet to see some update of classic 18 to 21 mm lens remake/remodel/renew for todays need on FF DSLR , don;t think the Zoom or the T&S the same kind of lens though ...


Well if autofocus is a MUST, of course Canon did pretty good job in Technology!


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週一 06 4月 09 17:41:46 
討論區管理員

註冊時間: 週四 27 11月 03 02:15:48
文章: 3194
來自: Moon Base Alpha
Its not just Auto focus. IMHO the Canon Wide angle sure left much to doubt, but on the other hand, the Canon Tele out do almost everybody else. The relatively cheap 70-200/4.0L was a very fine lens, likewise for many of their other better lens ... and its not just AF that they shine ...

As I like to state many times, these days, its rather impossible to over generalize on a brand and the lens ... we can say the same for Zeiss and Leica alike, and Nikon , Tamron and many ..... my motto on this, state which lens model, then we can start discussion, else its all just opinionated and with prejudice in most cases.

_________________
圖檔 圖檔 圖檔


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
 文章主題 :
文章發表於 : 週六 18 4月 09 13:42:51 
資深討論區會員

註冊時間: 週三 04 1月 06 22:55:14
文章: 3990
FR 寫:
Its not just Auto focus. IMHO the Canon Wide angle sure left much to doubt, but on the other hand, the Canon Tele out do almost everybody else. The relatively cheap 70-200/4.0L was a very fine lens, likewise for many of their other better lens ... and its not just AF that they shine ...

As I like to state many times, these days, its rather impossible to over generalize on a brand and the lens ... we can say the same for Zeiss and Leica alike, and Nikon , Tamron and many ..... my motto on this, state which lens model, then we can start discussion, else its all just opinionated and with prejudice in most cases.


所以我心目中最好的DSRL要有

Canon的白鏡 Support
Contax Zeiss Support (with Mount)
Fujifilm FUll Frame Super CCD or Kodak FULL FRAME CCD (LEAF)
Canon's Autofocus Speed
Olympus OM-1 的Body Stregth
Minolta 的ViewFinder
Contax Aria的Size
Support new Zeiss Lens
Support Sonny Autofocus Zeiss Lens (so als Minolta lens)
仲要Price 係一皮以內


回頂端
 個人資料  
 
顯示文章 :  排序  
發表新文章 回覆主題  [ 6 篇文章 ] 

所有顯示的時間為 UTC + 8 小時


誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 14 位訪客


不能 在這個版面發表主題
不能 在這個版面回覆主題
不能 在這個版面編輯您的文章
不能 在這個版面刪除您的文章

搜尋:
前往 :  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
正體中文語系由 竹貓星球 維護製作