引言回覆:
it is also evident that even at 2.8 there is hardly room for focusing errors if the optimum performance is required The accuracy of the rangefinder of the M9 is beyond reproach, but the optional magnifier (1.4x) is absolutely necessary
What a statement ... since before the M8 I've been saying that the classic M range finder is simply not good enough ( for the sensor ), and well at least someone agree with me now. So if f/2.8 require such, what about those f/2.0 and not to mention all those F/1.4 and even the Noct ...
I wonder what result would be like if we add D3 into the lineup and also shooting at something other than base ISO. No surprise or anything in the article, though I do not agree with the saying about Leica delivering film look and Nikon digital look ... they both do not deliver film image render when one actually examine the full size , they just deliver different render.
OK so a new ZF 35/1.4, would that surprise anybody for real .....