Terry Sham 寫:
vincenthoy28 寫:
wah 寫:
foobar 寫:
vincenthoy28 寫:
foobar 寫:
以銀色ZM50為例, 賣5K,
與 M50/2 chrome比,
個build質感爭好遠好遠,
而且是ZM是MIJ,
再諗埋保值和耐用桯度,
所以那3K的差價大概可説成大家C/P一樣.
Don't use one lens to compare as this is totally unfair!!
If you AB compare:
ZM25 to M24
ZM28 to M28
ZM35 to M35
我由頭到尾都剩係講 50, 一係我掉轉咁講, 所有ZM的PQ值是高過Leica M的 (如以閣下的公平想法), 除左50個枝.
原來如此
Your revised statment is much better to me.......
但您都係咁鍾情支50.
Seperate issue la...I would say:
1. If judging from the price of ZM50 only, I do agree this is not as attractive as Leica due to craftsmanship. Another way round, the C/P ratio is not as good as Leica current summicron 50/2.
2. However, if only looking at the optical performance, I do think that the current price of ZM50 is acceptable.
3. Beside ZM15, ZM50 & ZM85, I do think that all ZM have much higher CP ratio then current new Leica Lens. Especially all ZM lens optical performance is at the same level or better (ZM25) when compare with current Leica Lens.
5. No doubt that Leica Lens have very good craftsmanship but this is up to your decision to pay for at least over 50% or even 70% price for better craftsmanship.
6. In gerenal, I do think that ZM lens craftsmanship is acceptable.
登入
註冊
問答集
搜尋
